Texas Health Care Quality & Efficiency
← Back to Texas Health Care Factsheets
Inefficiencies Drive Up Health Care Costs
On the Commonwealth Fund’s State Scorecard “avoidable health costs” dimension – a measure that speaks to efficiency within the health care system – Texas ranked 48th overall. Texas came up amongst three other states (Maryland, Nevada and Louisiana) with the highest proportion of Medicare patients readmitted to the hospital within 30 days, a finding that the study shows “could be a key indicator of underlying care patterns that increase costs.”[1] In fact, total annual Medicare costs in the five states with the highest 30-day readmissions (Texas included) have average Medicare costs 38 percent higher than those states with the lowest readmission rates.[2] Texas also reappeared amongst the states with the highest rates of admission and readmission among nursing home residents.[3]
The last dimension measured by the Commonwealth Fund’s State Scorecard was “healthy lives” which refers to measures of mortality and disease prevalence. Here, the state received an average ranking (24th) and was above the state median on all but one dimension – mortality amenable to health care.[4] To see the full state scorecard for Texas or any other state, visit www.commonwealthfund.org/statescorecard, and use the interactive map to view scorecard results for each state. In addition the chart below from the Commonwealth Fund's Scorecard on Texas presents a unique look at how Texas would have fared if it performed as the top state for each of the dimensions. Because Texas has such a large population and such a high uninsured rate, Texas statistics skew those for the country as a whole. If Texas’ performance were to improve to the level of the best-performing state, according to the Commonwealth Fund State Scorecard, 2,680,422 adults and 965,127 children would have health insurance,[5] bringing down the country’s overall uninsured rate by one percentage point.
Estimated Impact of Improving Texas' Performance
Source: “State Scorecard: Texas.” The Commonwealth Foundation. 30 July 2007 <http://www.commonwealthfund.org/statescorecard/statescorecard_show.htm?doc_id=496088>.
24 % 14 % 15 %
[1] Ibid.
[2] “Aiming Higher: Results from a State Scorecard on Health System Performance,” The Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System, June 2007: p.34, 23 June 2007 <http://www.commonwealthfund.org/usr_doc/StateScorecard.pdf?section=4039>.
[3] Ibid.
[4] “State Scorecard: Texas,” The Commonwealth Foundation.

Sign Up for Our Free
Sign the Cover Texas Now
