Criminal Justice

Interfaith Dialouge on Death Penalty

The Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (TCADP) will sponsor an interfaith dialogue about capital punishment in San Antonio on Monday, October 24 at 7:00 p.m in the Laurie Auditorium on Trinity University's campus. The discussion will be led by a panel of San Antonio-area religious leaders. To reserve free tickets, call (512) 441-1808.  Click to register here

Juvenile Justice in the 82nd Legislature

SB 653 (Whitmire/Madden) reforms Texas juvenile justice system by merging two agencies into a single, newly created Texas Juvenile Justice Department.

The Texas Youth Commission (TYC) currently serves as the State’s juvenile corrections agency, overseeing youth committed to state confinement by local courts and youth on parole. The Texas Juvenile Probation Commission (TJPC) supervises the 165 juvenile probation departments in all 254 Texas counties, thus ensuring statewide access to juvenile probation services.

The legislation derives from an ongoing effort to improve juvenile justice processes and outcomes in Texas. Juvenile justice underwent substantial changes in Texas following a child sexual abuse scandal in 2007. While TYC and TJPC have made progress to implement reforms legislated in the wake of the scandal, ongoing problems have plagued the system.

Among other changes, SB 653 provides procedures for reporting complaints and clarifies the roles of administrators in order to ensure those complaints receive attention. For example, the legislation requires the TJJD to ensure that a toll-free hotline number functions twenty-fours hours a day, seven days a week in order for youths to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.

Furthermore, the legislation requires the TJJD to balance “the interests of rehabilitative needs with public safety,” and to create funding priorities without incentivizing incarceration. The new goal of the TJJD is to provide positive results for youths, their families, and the communities through a wide range of services.

Delinquency prevention and drop out prevention will be now within the purview of the new TJJD, whereas other agencies previously handled these issues.

The legislation ultimately aims to improve the experiences of all youth throughout the juvenile justice system and to further establish systems of oversight in order to ensure that reforms are implemented effectively.

William S. Bush, a special contributor to the "Austin American-Statesman," wrote a timely article on June 13, 2011 regarding SB 653.  The article discusses both the potential for the legislation and critiques potential issues.  In the article, Mr. Bush praises the merger for bipartisan support and for the promise of replacing incarceration of youth with "community-based treatment and diversion programs."  He emphasizes the need to provide the new agency with the necessary monies in order to implement the expected rehabilitative measures.  He reminds the public that the new agency will require oversight in order to realize its success.  "Local agencies must be held accountable for their actions and policies, and communication must strive for the highest level of transparency."  The article can be viewed here: http://www.statesman.com/opinion/bush-take-lessons-from-past-in-juvenile-justice-1535532.html?cxtype=rss_ece_frontpage.

 

Here's How They Voted On Final Passage of SB 653.

HOUSE

AYES - 146
Aliseda(R); Allen(D); Alonzo(D); Alvarado(D); Anchia(D); Anderson, Charles(R); Anderson, Rodney(R); Aycock(R); Beck(R); Berman(R); Bohac(R); Bonnen(R); Branch(R); Brown, Fred(R); Burkett(R); Burnam(D); Button(R); Cain(R); Callegari(R); Carter(R); Castro(D); Chisum(R); Christian(R); Coleman(D); Cook(R); Craddick(R); Creighton(R); Crownover(R); Darby(R); Davis, John(R); Davis, Sarah(R); Davis, Yvonne(D); Deshotel(D); Driver(R); Dukes(D); Dutton(D); Eiland(D); Eissler(R); Elkins(R); Farias(D); Farrar(D); Fletcher(R); Flynn(R); Frullo(R); Gallego(D); Garza(R); Geren(R); Giddings(D); Gonzales, Larry(R); Gonzalez, Naomi(D); Gooden(R); Guillen(D); Gutierrez(D); Hamilton(R); Hancock(R); Hardcastle(R); Harless(R); Harper-Brown(R); Hartnett(R); Hernandez Luna(D); Hilderbran(R); Hochberg(D); Hopson(R); Howard, Charlie(R); Howard, Donna(D); Huberty(R); Hughes(R); Hunter(R); Isaac(R); Jackson, Jim(R); Johnson(D); Keffer(R); King, Phil(R); King, Susan(R); King, Tracy(D); Kleinschmidt(R); Kolkhorst(R); Kuempel(R); Landtroop(R); Larson(R); Laubenberg(R); Lavender(R); Legler(R); Lewis(R); Lozano(D); Lucio III(D); Lyne(R); Madden(R); Mallory Caraway(D); Margo(R); Marquez(D); Martinez(D); Martinez Fischer(D); McClendon(D); Menendez(D); Miles(D); Miller, Doug(R); Miller, Sid(R); Morrison(R); Munoz(D); Murphy(R); Naishtat(D); Nash(R); Oliveira(D); Orr(R); Otto(R); Parker(R); Patrick, Diane(R); Paxton(R); Pena(R); Perry(R); Phillips(R); Pickett(D); Pitts(R); Price(R); Quintanilla(D); Raymond(D); Reynolds(D); Riddle(R); Ritter(R); Rodriguez(D); Schwertner(R); Scott(R); Sheets(R); Sheffield(R); Simpson(R); Smith, Todd(R); Smith, Wayne(R); Smithee(R); Solomons(R); Strama(D); Taylor, Larry(R); Taylor, Van(R); Thompson(D); Torres(R); Truitt(R); Veasey(D); Villarreal(D); Vo(D); Walle(D); Weber(R); White(R); Woolley(R); Workman(R); Zedler(R); Zerwas(R)

NAYS - 2
Shelton(R); Turner, Sylvester(D)

PRESENT-NOT-VOTING - 1
Straus(R)

ABSENT - 4
Gonzales, Veronica(D)

SENATE

Passed on 3rd reading and final passage.

The Future of Fusion Centers

Texas Impact’s legislative agenda includes the objective to improve law enforcement transparency and set goals for the Texas Fusion Center. For the past two years, we have worked closely with law enforcement departments in Austin and around the state to help work out a “best practice” system for fusion centers around the state.

This session, we have closely followed HB 3324 by Representative Ruth Jones McClendon, and SB 1572 by Senator Kirk Watson. Both bills seek to give the state additional rule-making authority over fusion centers, by establishing the Texas Fusion Center Policy Council under the Department of Public Safety to create rules, monitor, and advise fusion centers in this state. The bill language represents significant cooperation, authorship, and buy-in between legislators,  DPS officials, and advocates.

The Texas Fusion Center is the centerpiece in establishing and managing statewide intelligence capability. The legislation would give the Department of Public Safety tools to employ best practices in providing the appropriate structure and information for fusion centers in the state and would direct the Texas Fusion Center Policy Council to submit a report that contains a summary of the progress of fusion centers around the state.

HB 3324 has passed the House and is now in the Senate, and SB 1572 is now in the House. Both bills have been referred to the respective chamber committees. For McClendon’s bill, it’s the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Public Safety. For Watson’s bill, it’s the House Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security. Stay tuned for updates on the hearing, passage, and conference process.

Additional information on SB 1572.

Additional information on HB 3324.

HB 417

Bill Authors Last Name: 
Anchia
Bill Authors City: 
Dallas
Party Affiliation: 
D
Texas Impact Position: 
Support
Last Action: 
Passed 2nd Chamber
Caption: 

Relating to claims for compensation for wrongful imprisonment.

HB 3

Bill Authors Last Name: 
Thompson
Bill Authors City: 
Houston
Party Affiliation: 
D
Last Action: 
Referred to Committee (2nd Chamber)
Caption: 

Relating to the imposition of a sentence of life without parole on certain defendants who commit certain sexual offenses

Protecting the Mental Health of our Inmates

Administrative segregation is a form of isolated custody for offenders deemed dangerous to other offenders, staff, or themselves. These inmates are kept in a cell for up to 23 hours a day, and are ineligible for programmatic activity, training, and visits of the nature experienced by inmates in general population. According to TDCJ, as of August 31, 2010, approximately six percent of offenders incarcerated in prison in Texas were held in administrative segregation.

Advocates around the nation speak to the potential destructive effects of long-term segregation on the mental health of inmates, and the public safety concerns related to releasing inmates directly from administrative segregation to parole or into the public. In 2008, more than 1,000 TDCJ inmates completed their sentences in administrative segregation and were released directly into the community, without first being returned to general population for additional rehabilitation.

As people of faith, we strive to uphold our commitment to a God who demands that we respect the dignity of all human beings. We must invest in addressing the mental health needs of prisoners in a way that effectively contributes to their rehabilitation and successful transition back into their communities. Proposed legislation in the 82nd Legislature would direct the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to create a yearly report to the Legislature on the use of administrative segregation in the Texas prison system, and to institute a plan to improve the nature of confinement in administrative segregation.

SB 976

Bill Authors Last Name: 
Hinojosa
Bill Authors City: 
McAllen
Party Affiliation: 
D
Last Action: 
Reported from Committee
Caption: 

Relating to the determination of incompetency in criminal cases.

SB 24

Bill Authors Last Name: 
Van de Putte
Bill Authors City: 
San Antonio
Party Affiliation: 
D
Texas Impact Position: 
Support
Last Action: 
Signed
Caption: 

Relating to the prosecution, punishment, and certain criminal and civil consequences of offenses involving or related to the trafficking of persons and to certain protections for victims of those offenses.

HCR 68

Bill Authors Last Name: 
Hunter
Bill Authors City: 
Corpus Christi
Party Affiliation: 
R
Last Action: 
Reported from Committee (2nd Chamber)
Caption: 

Human Trafficking Report.

HB 3324

Bill Authors Last Name: 
McClendon
Bill Authors City: 
San Antonio
Party Affiliation: 
D
Texas Impact Position: 
Support
Last Action: 
Referred to Committee (2nd Chamber)
Caption: 

Relating to intelligence data standards and protected personal information.

Syndicate content