Budget

How the Budget Affects Your County


The proposed budgets by the House and Senate hurt Texans. Learn how the budget affects your county: 

Anderson
Andrews
Angelina
Aransas
Archer
Armstrong
Atacosta
Austin
Bailey
Bandera
Bastrop
Baylor
Bee
Bell
Bexar
Blanco
Borden
Bosque
Bowie
Brazoria
Brazos
Brewster
Briscoe
Brooks
Brown
Burleson
Burnet 
Caldwell 
Calhoun
Callahan 
Cameron 
Camp 
Carson 
Cass 
Castro 
Chambers 
Cherokee 
Childress 
Clay 
Cochran 
Coke 
Coleman 
Collin
Collingsworth 
Colorado 
Comal
Comanche
Concho 
Cooke 
Coryell
Cottle 
Crane 
Crockett 
Crosby 
Culberson 
Dallam
Dallas
Dawson 
Deaf Smith 
Delta 
Denton
DeWitt 
Dickens 
Dimmit
Donley
Duval
Eastland
Ector
Edwards
Ellis 
El Paso 
Erath 
Falls 
Fannin 
Fayette
Fisher 
Floyd
Foard
Fort Bend
Franklin
Freestone
Frio 
Gaines 
Galveston
Garza 
Gillespie 
Glasscock 
Goliad 
Gonzales 
Gray 
Grayson
Gregg
Grimes 
Guadalupe
Hale 
Hall 
Hamilton 
Hansford 
Hardeman
Hardin 
Harris
Harrison
Hartley 
Haskell 
Hays
Hemphill
Henderson 
Hidalgo
Hill 
Hockley 
Hood
Hopkins
Houston 
Howard 
Hudspeth 
Hunt
Hutchinson 
Irion 
Jack
Jackson 
Jasper 
Jeff Davis 
Jefferson
Jim Hogg 
Jim Wells 
Johnson
Jones 
Karnes
Kaufman 
Kendall 
Kenedy 
Kent 
Kerr
Kimble 
King 
Kinney 
Kleberg 
Knox 
Lamar 
Lamb 
Lampasas 
La Salle 
Lavaca 
Lee 
Leon 
Liberty 
Limestone 
Lipscomb 
Live Oak 
Llano 
Loving
Lubbock
Lynn 
Madison 
Marion 
Martin 
Mason 
Matagorda 
Maverick 
McCulloch 
McLennan
McMullen 
Medina
Menard
Midland
Milam
Mills 
Mitchell
Montague 
Montgomery
Moore 
Morris 
Motley 
Nacogdoches 
Navarro 
Newton 
Nolan 
Nueces
Ochiltree 
Oldham 
Orange
Palo Pinto 
Panola 
Parker 
Parmer 
Pecos
Polk 
Potter
Presidio 
Rains 
Randall 
Reagan
Real 
Red River 
Reeves 
Refugio 
Roberts 
Robertson 
Rockwall 
Runnels 
Rusk 
Sabine
San Augustine 
San Jacinto 
San Patricio 
San Saba
Schleicher 
Scurry 
Shackelford 
Shelby 
Sherman 
Smith 
Somervell
Starr 
Stephens 
Sterling 
Stonewall
Sutton 
Swisher 
Tarrant
Taylor 
Terrell 
Terry 
Throckmorton 
Titus
Tom Green 
Travis
Trinity 
Tyler 
Upshur
Upton 
Uvalde
Val Verde 
Van Zandt 
Victoria
Walker
Waller 
Ward 
Washington 
Webb
Wharton 
Wheeler 
Wichita
Wilbarger 
Willacy 
Williamson
Wilson 
Winkler
Wise 
Wood 
Yoakum 
Young 
Zapata
Zavala 

Senate Budget Inches Forward

 

UPDATE- 5:40 PM

Today, May 4, the Senate passed the budget by a vote of 19-12. The bill will now move to conference committee. As it stands now CSHB 1 removes $3 billion of Economic Stabilization (“Rainy Day”) Fund money from the bill, moves a $1.25 billion Medicaid payment into 2013 and enacts 1.2% cuts to all agencies besides the Foundation School Program. 

The Senate's version of the bill now spends $5 billion more in state funds than the House version. Senator Ogden promises to fight for the bill in committee while several Senators have pledged to fight against it. Senators opposing the bill raised issue with the magnitude of cuts being made to education, health care and social services. 

Senators want to characterize their budget as "better than the House budget." This is wishful thinking. The Senate budget results in most of the same draconian cuts as in the House budget, and is still inadequate for Texas.

 

 

UPDATE - 5:34 PM -

The Senate passes CSHB 1 to engrossment with a vote of 19 for to 12 against. See Sen. Ogden's closing remarks below.

 

 


UPDATE - 5:00 PM -

Senators are offering closing remarks on CSHB 1. Watch some of those remarks below:

Sen. Lucio


Sen. Ellis

 

50 Facts about the Senate Budget

The budget is the subject of countless news articles. It creates intrigue and debate between legislators, triggers rallies and protests from advocates, and leaves many Texans facing the propect of lost pay, lost benefits, and lost jobs. 

The Austin American Stateman has two detailed articles that break down the House and Senate versions of the budget in 50 facts. Below are the facts about the Senate budget. For a list of the House budget details, click here.

1) It spends $176.5 billion in all funds over the next two years, which is about $12 billion more than the House budget.

2) It would reduce current-biennium spending by about $11 billion, or 5.9 percent.

3) It leaves school districts about $4 billion short of the money that the state would owe them under current law.

4) It defers $2 billion in Foundation School Program payments from August 2013 to September 2013, pushing those costs to the next biennium so the 2013 Legislature can pay for them.

5) It spends up to $3 billion from the state’s rainy day fund. That number would be smaller if revenues came in higher than projected by the comptroller.

6) The budget provides for about 235,000 jobs in state government, a decrease of about 5,300.

7) It provides for 54,849 TEXAS Grants by 2013. That’s 32,000 fewer than in 2011, but about 28,000 more than the House budget as it went to the House floor.

8) It reduces the state contribution rate for employees’ retirement from 6.95 percent to 6 percent. But unlike the House plan, it raises the rate back up to 6.5 percent in 2013.

9) It spends $3.4 billion on debt payments, an increase of $631 million, or almost 23 percent, from the previous biennium.

10) It does not pay for enrollment growth at institutions of higher education. Yet enrollment at two- and four-year institutions grew 51 percent between 2000 and 2010.

11) It increases spending on services for crime victims by 4.6 percent.

12) It cuts $12 million in grants given to local law enforcement agencies for the continued training and education of officers.

13) It reduces funding for the Texas State Cemetery by $400,000, or almost 27 percent.

14) It saves $700,000 by replacing the in-house custodial staff at 48 state-owned buildings with contracted employees.

15) It reduces funding for operation of the governor’s office by $4.5 million, or 19 percent.

16) It provides $25 million in grants for disaster funding provided to state and local agencies when the governor finds that the demands on funds regularly appropriated are insufficient to respond to a particular disaster. That’s a reduction of 72 percent.

17) The bill provides $10 million for the Film and Music Marketing program in the governor’s office — a reduction of 85 percent.

18) It does not fund the Texas Enterprise Fund or the Emerging Technology Fund.

19) It reduces state funding for aid to local libraries from $16.2 million to $100,000.

20) It reduces total funding for community health services at the Department of State Health Services by about $150 million, or 4 percent.

21) The budget does not provide funding for caseload or cost growth in Medicaid, which would cost $1.7 billion in general revenue.

22) The budget anticipates federal flexibility in Medicaid that will save $700 million in general revenue.

23) It spends about $3.7 billion more than the House budget — all funds — on health and human services.

24) It reduces funding to regional education service centers by $23 million.

25) It zeroes out the $271 million technology allotment for schools.

26) The bill spends $1.8 million on steroid testing. The testing program is a pet cause for Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst. From a May 2010 story from the AP: “Nearly 50,000 tests since February 2008 have found only about 20 confirmed cases of steroid use.”

27) It reduces funding for the Student Success Initiative by $99 million.

28) Overall, discretionary state grant programs for public education would be reduced by $863 million — 64 percent. These programs include teacher incentive pay, grants for science labs, teen-parenting life skills and seat belts on school buses.

29) The budget maintains funding levels for the Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.

30) It makes a net decrease of at least $87.7 million in student financial aid programs.

31) It reduces general-revenue funding for higher education by 977 million, by 7.5 percent.

32) It reduces funding for the Texas Commission on Fire Protection by 13.6 percent, from $4.5 million to $3.9 million. 33) The number of state parks in operation would decrease from 92 to 86.

34) The amount of nitrogen oxide emissions reduced through the Texas Emission Reduction Plan would decrease from 17,425 tons to 6,794 tons.

35) It zeroes out grants for the development and acquisition of new local parks.

36) It reduces funding for the Low Income Vehicle Repair, Replacement and Retrofit Program by $75 million, or 75 percent.

37) It reduces the state contribution to TRS-Care (retired school employees’ group insurance program) by $120 million, or 23 percent.

38) The state contribution for teacher retirement benefits would decrease from 6.644 percent to 6 percent in 2012 and 6.4 percent in 2013.

39) It increases spending on border security from $111 million to $253 million.

40) It zeroes out the $4.3 million Wine Research and Education Program and the $1 million Feral Hog Abatement Program.

41) It reduces total funding for operations, minor repairs and program support at state parks by 11 percent.

42) The percentage of Texas Department of Transportation construction projects completed in time would decrease from 81 percent in 2011 to 70 percent in 2013.

43) It cuts from $20.1 million to $100,000 a program that provides case management and housing placement and retention services for homeless individuals and families. 

44) It eliminates a $7.4 million program that provides grants to improve public facilities and infrastructure in rural communities.

45) It eliminates a $3.1 million program that helps rural areas use renewable energy to cut energy costs and develop new sources of drinking water through salination.

46) It cuts $30 million — 38 percent — from customized job-training programs administered by the Texas Workforce Commission.

47) It cuts funding for Texas State Technical College by 7.4 percent.

48) It cuts 16 percent in funding for poison control.

49) It reduces funding for the Legislature itself by $31 million, or 8.3 percent.

50) It does not raise taxes.

Source: Austin American Statesman, First Reading Blog: May 2

Senate Moves Budget Out of Committee

The Senate Finance committee voted this morning to move their version of the budget bill out of committee. This bill spends $178.6 billion, including $85.9 billion in state funds (GR). The bill also uses $3 billion from the Economic Stabilization Fund, also known as the Rainy Day Fund.
Senators Patrick (R-Houston), Lucio (D-Brownsville), Whitmire (D-Houston) and Zaffirini (D-Laredo) all voted against passing the bill from committee. You can view the whole committee here

The Senate's version of the bill spends $8 billion more in state funds than the House version, but is still about $14 billion short of what the state needs to spend to maintain current services. As a result, services for the disabled, elderly, and poor will remain underfunded; teachers will loose their jobs; and college students won't get the assistance they need to pay their tuition. 

Texas Impact continues to urge the Legislature to use a balanced approach when they write the final budget. 

HB 275

Bill Authors Last Name: 
Pitts
Bill Authors City: 
Waxahachie
Party Affiliation: 
R
Last Action: 
Referred to Committee (2nd Chamber)
Caption: 

Relating to making an appropriation of money from the economic stabilization fund for expenditure during the current state fiscal biennium.

Vigil for the Future of Texas

House Budget Debate Day Two

flag_800

The House recessed part-way through the budget debate Friday night so that members could attend Rep. Alma Allen's husband's funeral. They are back Sunday, April 3 at 4pm to pick up where they left. Texas Impact will continue to bring you live updates via Twitter and Facebook, and video clips from the debate on YouTube. And yes, we will still be in the Chapel praying. Join us—in body or in spirit.

It's not a joke: The House is voting on the budget on April Fool's Day.

On April 1st, the Texas House of Representatives will vote on House Bill 1— a budget that closes schools, hikes college tuition, eliminates pre-K programs, shutters nearly all of the state's nursing homes, devastates community-based services for people with disabilities, and will ultimately leave 335,000 Texans jobless, reversing our state’s fragile economic recovery.

Please join people like you who care about the future of Texas for a vigil to preserve our state.

  • DATE: Friday, April 1, 2011
  • LOCATION: South Steps of the Texas Capitol
  • TIME: Noon to ???
  • WHAT: Vigil for the Future of Texas

We can’t let politicians make an April Fool out of Texas.

From noon on Friday until the budget is either passed or defeated, come rally with your fellow Texans for:

    * Regular updates from the House floor on which Texas priorities survived the cuts;
    * Teach-ins on the South Steps explaining how the budget will hurt Texas' future;
    * Continuous prayer vigil in the House Chapel, and Nightlight Vigil on the South Steps;
    * Musical performances by local artists
    * A mock "funeral" for all the programs and services this budget would cut

The message is simple: Vote NO on HB 1, and get to work crafting a plan that reflects Texans’ priorities. 

Contact us at (512) 472-3903 today for more details.

If you want to participate in the prayer vigil, sign up for a 20-minute time slot in the House Chapel by contacting Bee Moorhead at bee@texasimpact.org.  For more information about this event, call or email Texas Impact today at 512-472-3903 or bee@texasimpact.org.

Fri, 04/01/2011 - 12:00pm - Sat, 04/02/2011 - 12:00am

House Appropriations Committee Votes Out Budget Bill

On Wednesday, March 23, the House Appropriations Committee voted to pass the budget bill (HB 1) favorably out of committee. The vote was 18-7, with Representatives Turner, Giddings, Johnson, Martinez, Villarreal, McClendon and Hochberg voting 'nay.' You can all the members of the committee here: HAC Committee Members

The bill appropriates $164.5 billion for the 2012-2013 biennium, which is a 12.3 percent decrease from the amount appropriated in the 2010-2011 biennium. General revenue (the money that the state collects through taxes and fees) decreased from $87 billion in the 2010-2011 biennium to $77.6 billion in the 2012-2013 biennium, a 5.4 percent cut. The budget bill does not use any money from the state's Economic Stabilization Fund (Rainy Day Fund), which has about $6 billion. 

This budget lays out severe cuts that will affect the livelihood of millions of Texans. The bill lays out 10 percent cuts to Medicaid providers, an $8 billion cut in funding to school districts, and cuts to environmental regulatory agencies. Texas Impact is in the process of working through the 1000 page document and will be reporting on the cuts as we get there, so check back often for more detailed information. 

The budget will be heard on the House floor on Friday, April 1st. To see a full copy of the HB1 as reported from the committee, click here

Article II Cuts: Health and Human Services

Some cuts to the Department of Aging and Disabilities: 

  • DADS will loose $4.8 billion in funding for the biennium ($13.3B in 2010-2011 to $8.5B in 2012-2013). They receive $6.1 billion less than requested in the agency's Legislative Appropriations Request.
  • An average of 315 fewer Texans with intellectual or developmental disabilities will not recieve MHMR community services each month.
  • Payments to nursing homes will decrease from $4 billion (2010-2011) to $2.7 billion (2012-2013).
  • An average of 875 fewer Texans will be able to live in State Supported Living Centers each month.

Some cuts to the Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services

Some cuts to the Department of Family and Protective Services

  • DFPS will receive $450 million less than they requested in the agency's LAR
  • DFPS will be able to receive about 1000 fewer reports of child abuse or neglect than if they were funded at the rate in the agency's LAR.
  • 2,194 fewer at risk youth would receive intervention care and counseling each month through the STAR program.
  • DFPS would receive $8.3 million less to buy computers needed to do casework in the field ($22.8M in 2010-2011 to $14.5M in 2012-2013).

Some cuts to the Department of State Health Services

Some cuts to the Health and Human Services Commission

  • HHSC will loose $550 million in funding for the biennium ($35.7B in 2010-2011 to $35.2B in 2012-2013). They receive $15 billion less than requested in the agency's LAR. 
  • An average of 513,819 fewer children per month will receive access to Medicaid and CHIP, compared to estimated agency demand.
  • 3,432 fewer Texans per biennium will receive access to Family Violence Programs and Shelters, compared to estimated agency demand.
  • 14,400 fewer women will receive pregnancy support services as an alternative to abortion.

Article V Cuts: Public Safety and Criminal Justice

Some cuts to the Department of Criminal Justice

  • TDCJ will loose $400 million in funding for the biennium ($6.1 billion in 2010-2011 to $5.7 billion in 2012-2013).
  • 423 fewer residential facility beds for diversion programs, as compared to the agency's request.
  • 7000 fewer offenders with specials needs served through the Continuity of Care programs, as compared to the agency's request. 
  • 1350 fewer offenders will receive substance abuse treatment programs as compared with FY 2011. 

House Appropriations Votes Out HB 275

Last week, Bee wrote about the significance of HB 275, which Chairman Jim Pitts introduced to the House Appropriations Committee. HB 275 would appropriate money from the Economic Stabilization Fund ("Rainy Day Fund") to fill a budget deficit that exists in our current biennium (2010-2011). Read the article here

Yesterday, March 15, the House Appropriations Committee voted to use $3.2 billion from the Economic Stabilization Fund to balance part of the $4.3 billion budget deficit. The vote came after a tense meeting the previous day when Gov. Perry's representatives failed to appear before the committee. Pitts had invited the Governor's Office to publicly testify before the House Appropriations Committee that Gov. Perry would support using money from the RDF to close the deficit. 

The formal meeting on March 15 began an hour and a half late, but finally got started when Chairman Pitts read a press release from Gov. Perry ok-ing the use of the Economic Stabilization Fund. "We have worked closely with state leaders and lawmakers to balance the current budget, which includes using a one-time amount from the Economic Stabilization Fund to help our budget deal with the impact of the national recession." You can read the full press release here.

As stated, the current budget deficit is actually $4.3B, but as a part of a deal with Gov. Perry, the House Appropriations Committee only voted to use $3.2B with an additional $800m coming from previously called for cuts and $300m in new revenue that the Comptroller certified because of an increase in sales tax revenue. 

Gov. Perry drew ire from some lawmakers when he said that no money from the Economic Stabilization Fund should be used to close the $27B projected revenue shortfall in the 2012-2013 bieenium. This means that around $6B will be left sitting in the Fund as lawmakers slash funding to public and higher education; health and human services for the poor and disabled; and the criminal justice system. 

HB 275 will next move to the House floor for a vote by the whole chamber.

 

House Appropriations Has Questions for Combs

 

A Post-event "Live" Blog Report

8:00 – House Appropriations Committee video stream is on. It's early!
 
8:11 – Rep. Pitts, Chair of the House Appropriations Committee, kicks things off with an opening statement. 
 

 
8:13 – Chairman Pitts says: “As a body, we’re trying to figure out […] what our priorities as a state should be.” Clearly, the budget exceeded the Comptroller’s estimate, and “our budget is substantially below the constitutional threshold of being balanced.” Pitts lays out some “limited options” for the committee.
1) Use the Rainy Day Fund
2) Require further reductions from agencies (beyond 5 percent and 2.5 percent)
3) Defer certain payments
"None of these options come without consequences." Chairman Pitts closes by saying that the committee must weigh whether further reductions are practical and reasonable.
 
8:18 - Susan Combs, Texas Comptroller of Public Acounts, along with staff members John Heleman, Chief Revenue Estimator, and Suzy Whittenton, Director of Fiscal Management.
Combs says, “I'm a small business owner, and I have never emptied my bank account because I never know when the next drought will come."
 
8:20 – Combs states that she cannot certify new appropriations until the deficit is addressed, then begins a discussion of past usage of Rainy Day Fund. 
The 71st Legislative Session - used all of the Rainy Day Fund
The 73rd Legislative Session - used nearly all of the Rainy Day Fund ($125.8 million out of $156 million)
The 78th Legislative Session (2003) - used $1.2 billion (out of $1.5 billion). This paid for Health and Human Services (Medicaid) - $416.7 million, the Teacher Retirement System (TRS) - $516 million, the Enterprise Fund - $295 million, and small amounts were dedicated to other needs in the state.
 
8:24 - Rep. Turner has questions about the 2003 use of the Rainy Day Fund. He says that at that time, we were under a $10 billion shortfall and we used $1.2 billion to fund Health and Human Services (Medicaid), Teacher Retirement System (TRS), and the Enterprise Fund. He remembers using the funds to address the current shortfall, as well as the shortfall that we anticipated in the next biennium.
 
8:29 - Rep. Schwertner questions the rules on Medicaid flexibility and whether things were different in 2003. Will federal requirements about health and human services in future remove some of the flexibility we had in the past?
 
 
8:30 - Combs does not have glowing things to say about the next biennium - “2013 will probably not be a wonderful session either.”
 
8:31 - Rep. Villareal asks questions about the recent S&P report that encourages state budgets to use other sources of revenue to fill the growing funding gap, and emphasizes using structural solutions within the budget. Rep. Villareal has questions about the structural deficit.
 
8:32 - Heleman explains the makeup of the franchise tax and the ensuing structural deficit.
 
8:37 - Rep. Villareal says, “If you accept that the budget deficit is $27 billion, the franchise tax structural deficit accounts for 40% of our shortfall.”
 
8:39 - Rep. Otto asks if it is wise to depend on prosperous times to replenish the Rainy Day Fund again, and says that he doesn’t foresee the recovery happening at the rate it did in the past. Therefore, he is concerned about the risk of using all of the Rainy Day Fund.
 
8:43 - Rep. Turner insists that this budgetary shortfall is much much greater than it was in 2003. Rep. Turner says, “I wish this was 2003! If anyone is trying to say that [our current situation is] similar, they are not facing reality.” The representative reminds the committee that the Enterprise Fund and the Emerging Technology Fund were both boosted with Rainy Day Fund monies, and asks lawmakers to consider whether they are making the fiscal situation better, or worse. “At the end of the day, as appropriators, we need to know what we are buying. What are we getting for it?”
 
 
8:48 - Rep. Aycock asks about deferrals for school districts. 8:49 - Combs says, “We won’t get $4.3 billion with only cuts.”
 
8:51 - Discussion begins about how the presence or absence of a Rainy Day Fund affects Tax Revenue Anticipation Notes (TRANs) in August. TRANs are the short-term loan notes that the state uses to manage its cash flow between the Sept. 1 start of the fiscal year and the arrival of tax revenues later in the year. Established - Combs is authorized to tap into the Rainy Day Fund to pay off the TRAN.
 
8:57 - Heleman says that the whole country is going through this right now, “we’re no different” 8:57 - Rep. Aycock asks Combs, what she would do if she was in their place. Combs - “You’ve gotta fix the $4.3 billion hole. We will fix it one way or another”
 
8:59 - Combs urges the committee to “look at this as a 2-biennium problem. What you do today is the seed for the next session.”
 
 
9:01: Combs says that it is important for the legislature to be willing to deal with tough budgets.
 
9:02 - Rep. Giddings says, “Sometimes we have to spend some money on making an investment to reap dividends. By not spending the Rainy Day Fund, we could retard our own recovery.”
 
 
9:03 - Rep. Eiland starts a discussion about collecting the franchise tax on certain dates. This leads into another discussion about TRANs. Combs explains that it is common, established practice to use TRANs upfront, and then pay them back as tax revenue comes in.
 
9:13 - Heleman explains that this year the Biennial Revenue estimate is much lower than 2003, and mentions that in the mid-2000s, the economy was so strong that the state brought in much more money than expected. TRAN discussion continues. Rep. Eiland asks questions about the wisdom of multiple deferrals, paying on the 30th and then shifting to payment on the 1st.
 
9:24 - Rep. Crownover asks, “Is there a certain amount of money that we should keep in the Rainy Day Fund?” She calls the Rainy Day Fund a “tool in the toolbox” that has protected the state.
 
 
Combs says, “We’ve gotten down to $8 million and it’s not affected our bond rating, and we’ve gotten down to $0 and it’s not affected it.”
 
9:35 - Rep. Riddle asks, if we’re looking at seed-time and harvest, what bad seed do you think we should avoid?
 
 
Combs reminds the committee that the decisions they make now are important for the 2013 session, and urges them to “please look forward,” as they examine tax policies and tax structure. It is important to balance spending and revenue, and plan ahead.
 
9:38 - Combs says, “We love our Texas, we love our state, we think we’re the luckiest place to live.”
 
9:41 - Rep. Aycock asks what will happen if we don't use Rainy Day Fund, don't make cuts. Then what happens? Combs explains that the Comptroller is allowed to borrow from the Rainy Day Fund if no one does anything.
 
9:43 - Rep. Eiland busts out the constitution.
 
9:45 - Rep. Villareal - Our credit rating is based on many factors, and the Rainy Day Fund is a tool that isn’t cemented to the table, but is readily accessible--not just to have, but to use. Combs interjects - it was a measure of good foresight and pre-planning to create the Rainy Day Fund. Many states do not have one, and it is good management and good governance to invent “this animal.”
 
 
9:50 - Combs reminds members that the S&P report does not encourage completely depleting the Rainy Day Fund, and encourages them to use prudence.
 
10:00 - Rep. Pitts closes the Appropriations Committee meeting and members report to the House Floor.
 
 

For more updates from the legislative session, visit legetv.org and follow us on twitter @tximpact.  

HB 1

Bill Authors Last Name: 
Pitts
Bill Authors City: 
Waxahachie
Party Affiliation: 
R
Last Action: 
Passed 2nd Chamber
Caption: 

The House version of the State Budget. (Relating to appropriations for the 2012-2013 biennium)

Syndicate content